Question 1: How do different countries exchange or compete against each other?
Question 2: Which country has extensive freedom to technology, and that restricts the efficiency of its technology in comparison to the efficiency of the technology of other countries?
Question 3: Which country doesn’t indulge in technology exchange, and not in technology competitiveness, but ensures minimal technological efficiency?
Question 4: Can South Korea improve on its technology competitiveness?
Answer 2: If technology is seen as a contributor to economic growth, both products and employees can thrive as long as innovativeness, energy and freedom to voice out opinions are kept low.
Since the government guarantees “no restrictions on all forms of expression” and free-market competition allows other companies to flourish and entrench their technological knowledge and unique value-add-investment ideas, South Korea can establish technology competitiveness, which focuses on technological innovation.
“Opportunities for export as well as an investment are dictated by the industry’s regulations and demand, reflecting how the nation proceeds in the broader context of technology development, on how much of a focus there is on innovation.”
For instance, South Korea’s automobile industry must “exercise flexibility in assembly and option selection” to be in competition with overseas exporters in automotive because most of South Korea’s other industries are “marketed based on strategic industries.”
Questions 1 and 2: Is a country technology-independent? Can technology flexibility be adopted for tech to prevent a technology-dependent society?
Answer 1:
While there is concern that Europe and the United States both regarding technology as the drive for economic growth, South Korea must maintain its own technology independence because “in spite of the arguments around the benefits of technology competitiveness, people demand that there be the protection of social and cultural factors and human rights.”
At the same time, a technology-independent society is not an ideal situation in the long run because people and economies generally work better when they are partnered together. The richness of South Korea’s cultural diversity allows its rich culture to prevail. A successful democracy has also ensured democracy, and South Korea is a highly democratic society.
After the South Korean and Vietnamese populations have similar values on women and Buddhism in comparison to the majority of the country’s population, a country that has a technology-independent population would likely be a technology-dependent society.
Therefore, “The” statement about technology is more likely to be true in the long term.
Question 3: What are the downsides of the increasing level of technology reliance in South Korea?
Answer 1: “We can’t easily control how technology enters our society, how democratic norms will evolve, and how quickly technology will saturate the economy. And we don’t know what that means and what effect technology might have on our young people.”
Over time, technology dependency could lead to a situation where societies such as South Korea might create a gap between economic and cultural values, especially for women, so many might start working in fields with great impact and hold back productivity when companies, governments, and businesses face big challenges.
0 Comments